4 ms·
Tough luck. Doesn’t justify a huge avenue of money laundering of whatever is possible
by louwrentius 3y ago
Tough luck. Doesn’t justify a huge avenue of money laundering of whatever is possible
- alwayslikethis 3y agoI doubt you would have said the same if it affected you.
- lxgr 3y agoTo be honest, I don't think that attitude is good enough. There are technical ways to prevent money laundering and tax evasion at the same time as keeping anonymous payments possible. Sure, it's more complicated than just outright banning any type of anonymous payment, but I think not even trying would amount to a huge loss of resiliency for any democracy. We also don't blanket ban secure private communications (although not for a lack of trying) for the same reason.
- zrn900 3y agoYeah, it actually does. Societies cannot be left to the whims of privately owned payment processors that depend on the 'public sentiment' and not the actual laws to make their policies to protect their stock value. If every government guaranteed an online payment system that 100% worked for all legal purposes, you'd have point. There's no such thing. The entire digital payment system is left to private feudal lords to control as they please.