5 ms·
You're not "wrong" but Sqlite isn't your run-of-the-mill project. "The SQLite file format is stable, cross-platform, and backwards compatible and the developers
by hgs3 3y ago
You're not "wrong" but Sqlite isn't your run-of-the-mill project. "The SQLite file format is stable, cross-platform, and backwards compatible and the developers pledge to keep it that way through the year 2050." [1]
[1] https://www.sqlite.org/ https://www.sqlite.org/
- orf 3y agoHow different is this to any other run of the mill project with few active developers on a single implementation, with backwards compatibility based entirely on promises? Hot take: SQLite has bugs and quirks.
- paulddraper 3y agoHow many sqlite implementations are there? Do you need to generate sqlite bindings for every language/runtime? E g. Cloudflare workers
- wakawaka28 3y agoI suppose you do need bindings for every language. But sqlite is in C and is extremely popular. If you can't get bindings as one of the first third party libraries your language supports, it's probably a shitty language anyway.
- paulddraper 3y agoBrilliant
- OttoCoddo 3y agoA couple, but simple. No, you will only need Pack, everything is built into it. Pack is built for Windows and Linux, and more will come. You will be able to run it on almost all CPUs.