This is a really cool idea you're sharing from Martin Heidegger, I feel like it puts to words part of why I tend to side a bit more with Apple on this. It seem

This is a really cool idea you're sharing from Martin Heidegger, I feel like it puts to words part of why I tend to side a bit more with Apple on this. It seems adjacent to my thinking of who (and under what authority) can tell a company that they need to dedicate their resources to work on something they don't want to? In this case, the outcome would be the DOJ basically forcing Apple to use it's resources to help Samsung/Google. Apple certainly has the resources to do this, but it feels like there's a missing logical bridge here and that it sets a precedent that is based somewhat just on the current zeitgeist. I acknowledge this could just be my interpretation of everything, and that if there's political will and support for action to be taken, then so it goes.