Would it be correct in saying that a semantic map, clustered by meaning, might be pushing it? If the data are word embeddings, then you'd hope that they have di

Would it be correct in saying that a semantic map, clustered by meaning, might be pushing it? If the data are word embeddings, then you'd hope that they have distilled the semantics in the raw text but as you said yourself, they are also heavily influenced by style and who knows what else, to the point that semantically identical but syntactically different texts might have different clusters? Think, if half of the texts were in French, would you keep the same semantic map or would you have a French continent and an English continent?