2 ms·

I'm not sure what you mean by 4k(1080), but... I have an LG 38WN95C-W Ultrawide [0]. It's great for coding, great for video (IPS LCD so obv not deep OLED blacks

I'm not sure what you mean by 4k(1080), but... I have an LG 38WN95C-W Ultrawide [0]. It's great for coding, great for video (IPS LCD so obv not deep OLED blacks), great for games... 3840x1600 resolution, which is roughly 3/4 of 4K cut horizontally. [0] https://www.lg.com/uk/monitors/ultrawide/38wn95c-w/ https://www.lg.com/uk/monitors/ultrawide/38wn95c-w/

bouke 3y ago
By 4K (1080) I meant that a 4K screen has a typical resolution of 3840x2160, which gives you at 2x scale factor an equivalent screen estate as a 1920x1080. That's too little screen estate for me. The screen you referenced would be even less than that at 2x scaling factor: 1920x900, which is even fewer screen estate. A 4k ultrawide is not retina, so doesn’t cut it.
- cassianoleal 3y ago
  I use it with an 1x scaling factor, so 3840x1600.
  - bouke 3y ago
    My question is in spirit with what this article is suggesting: upgrade your displays to get crisp rendered text at 2x scaling factor.