3 ms·

How is it proprietary? It's using the SSPL which offers copyleft user freedoms

• gkbrk 3y ago
  You can split software licenses roughly into two, open-source and proprietary. Since SSPL is not open-source, it's considered proprietary.
  • redwood 3y ago
    What do you consider the AGPL and other copy left licenses? Even the OSI director acknowledges this one needs another look in the fulness of time here
    • gkbrk 3y ago
      I consider AGPL open-source. Same with other open-source copy-left licenses like GPL or LGPL.