4 ms·
I worked on a project that was using Bulma last week and to be honest, while not bad per se, it just felt like Bootstrap but with a lot less to offer. I'm prob
by conradfr 3y ago
I worked on a project that was using Bulma last week and to be honest, while not bad per se, it just felt like Bootstrap but with a lot less to offer.
I'm probably missing something.
- kovezd 3y agoThat's the appeal: is lightweight.
- conradfr 3y agoI guess that makes sense.
- diggan 3y ago> it just felt like Bootstrap but with a lot less to offer. Make sense, Bulma is a CSS-only framework while Bootstrap (last time I used it) also has JavaScript parts to it, so naturally it'd have less to offer.
- partiallypro 3y agoBootstrap is too heavy even when you customize what you're getting, I wish that Foundation would get an update that strips its jQuery dependency, but that project seems mostly dead though I prefer it.