I don't see the identical twin / soundalike argument as relevant because we are talking about using an AI with the specific intent of impersonation. This doesn’

I don't see the identical twin / soundalike argument as relevant because we are talking about using an AI with the specific intent of impersonation. This doesn’t ban cover bands or soundalikes. Even so, I think there are some existing laws around such things, and I think such acts need to pay royalties in some form. I don’t want to go down that rabbit hole, to be honest. Regardless, no actual Libertarian position was presented in the article. The comment I responded to was making a dig at Libertarians and the State of Kentucky. Even though I find a lot of Libertarians abrasive and that their ideology is incompatible with actual governance, I still like to analyze how they think. My goal was to provide a perspective on why a Libertarian might be okay with such a law.