3 ms·
> otherwise it wouldn't be viable for the company that wants the infrastructure. Well, isn’t that a proof that the benefit doesn’t balance the downsides? What
by eastbound 3y ago
> otherwise it wouldn't be viable for the company that wants the infrastructure.
Well, isn’t that a proof that the benefit doesn’t balance the downsides? What if the answer were really “We shouldn’t build more infrastructure, we shouldn’t overpopulate this city anymore” ?