4 ms·

I did not realize this until now, thanks for pointing it out. I will have to find an alternative because explaining to clients that I use software that openly a

I did not realize this until now, thanks for pointing it out. I will have to find an alternative because explaining to clients that I use software that openly and prolifically “sells out” to casinos isn’t something I want to spend my time doing

theallan 3y ago
Daft question, but if you hadn't realised, then your client's obviously asked that question yet (and might not)? Open source needs to find a way to make money and backlinks is a reasonable way of doing it. I should say for my own open source project I refuse backlinks to gambling sites on morality grounds though - although looking at how much revenue it might bring in on a monthly basis, there is a lot of temptation there.
- joeyhage 3y ago
  In my mind, it’s one thing to omit information I don’t know but another to withhold information
  - jddj 3y ago
    It's a bunch of CSS convenience classes, you haven't stumbled upon the panama papers here.
    - joeyhage 3y ago
      Agreed, but I’m free to curate the tools I use based on whatever criteria I want.
      - mfru 3y ago
        Sure, if you have the privilege to make your life unnecessarily harder than it is, then choosing another CSS framework based on whether it has shady sponsors or not is a great pastime.
Uehreka 3y ago
I was gonna make a jokey comment, but I’m seriously at a loss for words. This is the most overtorqued ridiculous take I’ve read all week. Who cares who else is using the free libraries that you’re using?
- joeyhage 3y ago
  They are paying sponsors, not consumers. You should read the rest of the comments about these specific gambling organizations and their motives.