5 ms·
It is not. I would welcome you to watch actual debates. This definition of faith is what happens when arguments are defeated. The response will always be “Well
by wredue 3y ago
It is not. I would welcome you to watch actual debates. This definition of faith is what happens when arguments are defeated. The response will always be
“Well that’s where you have to have faith”
- kybernetikos 3y agoThat doesn't mean that there is no evidence for the faith they are advocating.
- wredue 3y agoWhen the evidence you present is defeated and you respond “that’s where you have to have faith”, that is literally “belief absent evidence”. That’s not even counting the types of “evidence”. Like “ nature is beautiful” and “bananas fit in your hand and angle toward your mouth”.
- mistermann 3y ago> The response will always be You are not actually omniscient, it only seems like you are, and you have faith in your perception (as you have been taught to by the ideology you were raised in).
- wredue 3y agoI was raised as a Christian. I sent an observation that is consistent even among some of the most stringent bible believing people.
- mistermann 3y agoThough it may seem like you possess omniscient knowledge of all that exists, this too is a false belief you've picked up from different ideological indoctrination you've been subjected to, one which is much stealthier than Christianity. A possible remedy: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tautology_(logic) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tautology_(logic) They key flaw in your model of reality (or in your ideology's terminology: reality) is the inconsistency between "always" and "some".