I can and will continue to say that he is probably Satoshi because there is a large amount of evidence for that being the case. In the past, Adam elaborated rea

I can and will continue to say that he is probably Satoshi because there is a large amount of evidence for that being the case. In the past, Adam elaborated reasons why he thinks it's good for bitcoin that Satoshi be anonymous and he has a large vested interest in the success of bitcoin (his business), so his public (and according to you private) denial is really not good evidence one way or the other.