4 ms·
I haven't read this license but I wished they had at least gone with the BASL. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Source_License https://en.wikipedia.org/wi
by Pet_Ant 3y ago
I haven't read this license but I wished they had at least gone with the BASL.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Source_License https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Source_License
IANAL, but AFAICT the BASL is not open-source, but it is _eventually_-open-source is in the source will automatically transition to being open source (GPL v2 or compatible... not sure if either BSD or AGPL work).
But if you are going to go source available, license proliferation is still a problem, please try to maintain sanity.
- remram 3y agoThe SPDX identifier for Business Source License is BUSL: https://spdx.org/licenses/BUSL-1.1.html https://spdx.org/licenses/BUSL-1.1.html I have never seen anyone refer to it as "BASL".
- Pet_Ant 3y agoToo late to edit it now, thanks for the correction. I knew there was a vowel in there and it was just "BSL" as the Wikipedia page has it. My bad.