3 ms·
hello, fwiw ... personally i still use GNU mailman - but version 2, not the more current version 3. why!? idk, version 3 seems unnecessary "bloated" in compar
by t312227 3y ago
hello,
fwiw ... personally i still use GNU mailman - but version 2, not the more current version 3.
why!? idk, version 3 seems unnecessary "bloated" in comparison to the older and "somewhat" easier-to-use version 2.
but for a new setup, i would definitely go for example with mlmmj - i'm even considering migration to it from my aging mailman2 setup :))
* http://mlmmj.org/ http://mlmmj.org/
[disclaimer: i've used djbs ezmlm back in the days ... and i'm still a big fan of his software / approach to software.
but over the years keeping it running / maintaining it was a bit annoying, so i switched
* https://cr.yp.to/ezmlm.html https://cr.yp.to/ezmlm.html
:]
just my 0.02€
- quesera 3y agoThanks for the link to mlmmj ! I agree that ezmlm was the high point of mailing list software. :) mlmmj looks like a properly-conceived modern option to consider though!
- b112 3y agohttps://github.com/jaredmauch/mailman2-python3 https://github.com/jaredmauch/mailman2-python3 Haven't tried it yet.
- ale42 3y agoI'm working with mlmmj since a few years and am happy with it. Some functions that edit headers (like prepending a text in the subject) should not be used in environments where users can have mailboxes everywhere (not just on your local domain) because it invalidates DKIM signatures...