3 ms·

We had those feelings when DOS came along to replace Unix. Then we had that feeling when we had to choose Windows over OS/2. Then we had the same feeling when

We had those feelings when DOS came along to replace Unix. Then we had that feeling when we had to choose Windows over OS/2. Then we had the same feeling when the Internet came along - it was going to DOOM programming everywhere. Then we had that feeling when AOL dumped its users on the Internet. Then we had that feeling when Google rose, and all the Web 2.0 came along to make everyones' dreams of a free and open Internet dystopian and decrepit. You can't use AI if you can't talk to AI, and you can't talk to AI if you don't understand things the way that AI does. AI is us. Just like the Internet was/is/will always be. In 10 years time when nobody programs any more, what will train the AI? The dog that was put there to stop us touching the computer? ;)

binary132 3y ago
> AI is us In case you hadn’t noticed, “us” is the competition. But the machine “us” can be made arbitrarily faster and cheaper than us, for what is converging on a similar technical skillset.
- boffinAudio 3y ago
  AI is nothing without us. Sure, it has a big set of training data now - but just how far do you think this will recurse before the knowledge becomes useless? I'm not convinced AI is anything other than just another grep. A fancy one, for sure, but still its only as good as the data you give it. As has been the case with computers since the very beginning. Of course, some AI-pro head will come along and tell me why I'm wrong, but the proof is in the pudding. If nobody is coding any more, how will AI learn how to code? Is AI the ultimate stagnation of technology? It really could be, you know. As it stands right now, I'm seeing junior programmers who cannot get AI to do things, whereas I can get AI to do things better than a junior programmer. But thats only because of my experience and knowledge. AI can be made to function really, really well as a junior dev - but only for as long as there are really good datasets from real human developers out there to work with. If the kids don't keep learning to program, that dataset is going to stagnate...
- aleph_minus_one 3y ago
  > But the machine “us” can be made arbitrarily faster and cheaper than us, for what is converging on a similar technical skillset. Reading less marketing pitches from these AI companies is good for your sanity. :-D

binary132 3y ago

> AI is us In case you hadn’t noticed, “us” is the competition. But the machine “us” can be made arbitrarily faster and cheaper than us, for what is converging on a similar technical skillset.

boffinAudio 3y ago
AI is nothing without us. Sure, it has a big set of training data now - but just how far do you think this will recurse before the knowledge becomes useless? I'm not convinced AI is anything other than just another grep. A fancy one, for sure, but still its only as good as the data you give it. As has been the case with computers since the very beginning. Of course, some AI-pro head will come along and tell me why I'm wrong, but the proof is in the pudding. If nobody is coding any more, how will AI learn how to code? Is AI the ultimate stagnation of technology? It really could be, you know. As it stands right now, I'm seeing junior programmers who cannot get AI to do things, whereas I can get AI to do things better than a junior programmer. But thats only because of my experience and knowledge. AI can be made to function really, really well as a junior dev - but only for as long as there are really good datasets from real human developers out there to work with. If the kids don't keep learning to program, that dataset is going to stagnate...
aleph_minus_one 3y ago
> But the machine “us” can be made arbitrarily faster and cheaper than us, for what is converging on a similar technical skillset. Reading less marketing pitches from these AI companies is good for your sanity. :-D