> They asserted copyright over LLaMA, which is obviously bogus since it was trained on data they do not own the copyright to. Not saying I agree with FB here,

> They asserted copyright over LLaMA, which is obviously bogus since it was trained on data they do not own the copyright to. Not saying I agree with FB here, but infringing on someone else's copyright doesn't suddenly void their own copyright to their contributions. A more sensible defense for you here is that copyright law likely doesn't give them any rights to any weights at all.