3 ms·
Notably absent from the article is that younger workers tend to be cheaper. I didn't find the article particularly insightful. And ageism isn't a new phenomeno
by switch007 3y ago
Notably absent from the article is that younger workers tend to be cheaper.
I didn't find the article particularly insightful. And ageism isn't a new phenomenon
- ryandrake 3y agoHow does this square with the other phenomenon we’ve all seen where new (usually younger) hires get larger compensation packages than existing employees relying on raises? If young people are actually cheaper, why do they come in making more money than the veterans already there? Not sure how both can be true.
- nh23423fefe 3y agobecause you are comparing different groups? new younger people are cheaper than new older people. existing employees have friction against leaving so employers can pay less to retain. retention isn't new hiring.