4 ms·

Taking an established open-source project with a healthy ecosystem and community and making it proprietary overnight is already destroying their community.

• redwood 3y ago
  How is it proprietary? It's using the SSPL which offers copyleft user freedoms
  • gkbrk 3y ago
    You can split software licenses roughly into two, open-source and proprietary. Since SSPL is not open-source, it's considered proprietary.
    • redwood 3y ago
      What do you consider the AGPL and other copy left licenses? Even the OSI director acknowledges this one needs another look in the fulness of time here
      • gkbrk 3y ago
        I consider AGPL open-source. Same with other open-source copy-left licenses like GPL or LGPL.