3 ms·

They'd be destroying their community

• gkbrk 3y ago
  Taking an established open-source project with a healthy ecosystem and community and making it proprietary overnight is already destroying their community.
  • redwood 3y ago
    How is it proprietary? It's using the SSPL which offers copyleft user freedoms
    • gkbrk 3y ago
      You can split software licenses roughly into two, open-source and proprietary. Since SSPL is not open-source, it's considered proprietary.
      • redwood 3y ago
        What do you consider the AGPL and other copy left licenses? Even the OSI director acknowledges this one needs another look in the fulness of time here
        • gkbrk 3y ago
          I consider AGPL open-source. Same with other open-source copy-left licenses like GPL or LGPL.