2 ms·
Very difficult (or often impractical) to not have a shell at all, and jq is at least limited in scope, and has no dependencies that need to be installed. Far be
by bdcravens 3y ago
Very difficult (or often impractical) to not have a shell at all, and jq is at least limited in scope, and has no dependencies that need to be installed. Far better than a full language with its own standard library and set of dependencies to lock down.