2 ms·
The state and local government pensions I'm familiar with should actually be safer than most pension systems -- in theory, the government agency makes its requi
by jaredg 18y ago
The state and local government pensions I'm familiar with should actually be safer than most pension systems -- in theory, the government agency makes its required contributions to the trust fund at the time the employee is paid. The bigger state and local pension systems are some of the largest institutional investors, so their fates are more tied to the market than their member governments.
As with any other pension system, if a lot of the trust's holdings are in bonds, and those bonds end up in default, that would be a problem.
The government pensions schemes are facing the same problem as Social Security -- people living and collecting benefits longer, health care costs going up (for those that include long term health benefits), and so on.
- bwd 18y ago"The state and local government pensions I'm familiar with should actually be safer than most pension systems" Considering the fact that many defined benefit programs look about as safe as ticking time bombs, this doesn't particularly reassure me. In addition, there is the problem of actuarial assumptions. I remember a New York state actuary getting in trouble because he was being paid by the state labor unions earlier this year and came across this article while I was trying refresh my memory of the details: http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/05/21/business/pension.php http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/05/21/business/pension.php