> “Mr. Hay had no reasonable expectation of privacy in a view of the front of his house,” said the U.S. Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals in its decision on U.S. v

> “Mr. Hay had no reasonable expectation of privacy in a view of the front of his house,” said the U.S. Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals in its decision on U.S. vs Hay. “As video cameras proliferate throughout society, regrettably, the reasonable expectation of privacy from filming is diminished.” That's an aspect of the law that many people don't take into account: things like what "reasonable" means can change as society's behavior changes. There was a great essay about this by Alex Kozinski in the Stanford Law Review in 2012 [1]. [1] https://www.stanfordlawreview.org/online/privacy-paradox-the-dead-past/ https://www.stanfordlawreview.org/online/privacy-paradox-the...