Sure. I would speculate that the victim of the surveillance would not challenge the surveillance based on the notion that they are entitled to privacy, but inst

Sure. I would speculate that the victim of the surveillance would not challenge the surveillance based on the notion that they are entitled to privacy, but instead, that the operator of the recording equipment is not entitled to operate it, either because it is not permitted first amendment activity or, more narrowly, because it breaches the peace. Court would rule against the idiot trying to mess with the judge and society would continue to function normally.