There is a discussion related to naming on GitHub: https://github.com/vuejs/vitepress/discussions/548 https://github.com/vuejs/vitepress/discussions/548 Given

There is a discussion related to naming on GitHub: https://github.com/vuejs/vitepress/discussions/548 https://github.com/vuejs/vitepress/discussions/548 Given that version 1 landed as "VitePress" they probably decided to keep the name. > I initially gave VitePress a different name because I wanted to be able to explore a different architecture without worrying about backwards compat. After shipping the vuejs.org with VitePress, I believe VitePress is flexible enough to be a full replacement of current VuePress while offering better DX and better performance. > ... > I think we should ship VitePress stable as VuePress 3, but I am open to potential questions and concerns. > Pros: Less confusion in the long run. There will be just one officially maintained SSG with better DX, better performance, and customization that fully aligns with standard Vite-based Vue apps. > Cons: Potential confusion in the short run, since there are probably a lot of tutorials / integrations targeting VuePress 1. Still I think with the recent Vue 3 switch, users won't be surprised with a major upgrade for VuePress.