> If the definitions set forth by the DOJ are accepted by courts, this is a slam dunk on Apple. This is a very low bar. It is of course the case that if you as

> If the definitions set forth by the DOJ are accepted by courts, this is a slam dunk on Apple. This is a very low bar. It is of course the case that if you assume one party's definitions are accepted then they will win. The battlefield will be the definitions (just like in patent law the battlefield is the claim construction).