4 ms·
The argument says “emissions reduced”, not “full electrification.” And reducing emissions is cheaper than destroying the world we live in.
by two_handfuls 3y ago
The argument says “emissions reduced”, not “full electrification.” And reducing emissions is cheaper than destroying the world we live in.
- caminante 3y agoHow much do you want to pay for zero/negative emissions?
- two_handfuls 3y agoreducing emissions is cheaper than destroying the world we live in.
- caminante 3y agoLOL. Don't get offended. You know that's not my question, and you also know I represented the author accurately (See "forget o&g")