4 ms·
IMO musl is the right way forward if you want to optimize for minimalism, security, and making it easy to build static binaries in most languages.
by lrvick 3y ago
IMO musl is the right way forward if you want to optimize for minimalism, security, and making it easy to build static binaries in most languages.
- anthk 3y agoNot just static builds. An alpine chroot with bubblewrap and mosh for non-supported distros weights less than 60MB.
- musicale 3y agoI wonder how much larger that is than, say, classic Unix distributions like 4.3BSD.
- musicale 3y agoAnd glibc is bad until it can be used reliably for static builds.