5 ms·
The argument stands. Forget O&G. Nobody wants to pay for full electrification, despite having readily available tech. You can't argue the opposite with a stra
by caminante 3y ago
The argument stands.
Forget O&G.
Nobody wants to pay for full electrification, despite having readily available tech. You can't argue the opposite with a straight face.
FWIW, the author conflates CO2 storage as enhanced oil recovery applications only.
- two_handfuls 3y agoThe argument says “emissions reduced”, not “full electrification.” And reducing emissions is cheaper than destroying the world we live in.
- caminante 3y agoHow much do you want to pay for zero/negative emissions?
- two_handfuls 3y agoreducing emissions is cheaper than destroying the world we live in.
- caminante 3y agoLOL. Don't get offended. You know that's not my question, and you also know I represented the author accurately (See "forget o&g")