I'm sorry to be that guy, but this could be a textbook example of how _not_ to write a book review.: - Most of it barely mentions the book, consisting instead

I'm sorry to be that guy, but this could be a textbook example of how _not_ to write a book review.: - Most of it barely mentions the book, consisting instead of irrelevant ramblings about the reviewer's personal life. - When it does mention the book's contents, it's mostly just disjointed technical snippets ("there is a tiny cryptographic detail of the working of the Diffie-Hellman protocol that is not exactly correct") that make no sense without context if you haven't read the book yourself. - The actual assessment of the book is super-vague and teaches us nothing (the book is "well researched" and the reviewer "learned a lot".) After reading this "review" I still barely even understand what this book is about or what makes it different from the million other new Bitcoin books that flood the Kindle store every time there's another bear market.