> there is a likelihood of losing valuable talent to companies with remote-friendly working conditions. They ARE losing talent to remote-friendly companies, ac

> there is a likelihood of losing valuable talent to companies with remote-friendly working conditions. They ARE losing talent to remote-friendly companies, actually. It's just that retaining talent isn't their priority. They overhired and don't want a PR issue so they'd rather make it as miserable as possible so that some people leave on their own.