> I do not think this risk is large. But I do think it is a real risk that a cautious Linux distro can reasonably be worried about. The 2nd or 3rd most commerc

> I do not think this risk is large. But I do think it is a real risk that a cautious Linux distro can reasonably be worried about. The 2nd or 3rd most commercially important Linux distro has been using ZFS since 2016. > If you truly believe that Oracle's lack of action thus far against ZFS on Linux and their public statements of their beliefs about the effects of the CDDL and GPL would prevent them from starting shit I understand the argument "Oracle might do something", plus spooky magic fingers and creepy noises, all too well. Except it's not actually an argument. It might be best described as a boogeyman, sent to frighten little children into not running ZFS. My point was: I think it's time for you to get over sleeping with the light on. In 2000, we called this FUD when Microsoft did this. In 2024, we should know better, even when you're fronting for the FSF or the SFC.