3 ms·
Yes. I also want to know. Edit. Ah! Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. I read back a couple of comments and it clicked
by andybak 3y ago
Yes. I also want to know.
Edit. Ah!
Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. I read back a couple of comments and it clicked
- wolverine876 3y agoEncylopedia. It wasn't created in the 18th century. :)
- CyberDildonics 3y agohttps://sapling.ai/usage/encyclopedia-vs-encyclopaedia https://sapling.ai/usage/encyclopedia-vs-encyclopaedia
- wolverine876 3y agoWhy would I trust that (even if it strongly supports my claim)? And if true, I wonder what it would look like in the absence of Encyclopaedia Britannica, which accounts for 99% of the instances that I've seen the archaic spelling.