Even then this displays a remarkable lack of understanding on what llms are and how they work. They have a fuzzy memory of things, so when you ask for citations

Even then this displays a remarkable lack of understanding on what llms are and how they work. They have a fuzzy memory of things, so when you ask for citations you'll get titles, names and journals that seem plausible because they're centred around the distribution of names you'd expect for a paper of the kind that was required to support a specific point but llms don't have the capacity to resolve information to that degree, otherwise we'd have losslesscompression of all public works in a few gb of data. That would be as if not more ground breaking than llms chat capacity.