2 ms·

> Basically, you tell your AI what you want to do, and it does the computer work for you, showing the results the way you like. You won't have to dig through to

> Basically, you tell your AI what you want to do, and it does the computer work for you, showing the results the way you like. You won't have to dig through tons of useless apps anymore. It'll search, sort, and create feeds for you. This is what scares advertisers the most Not just advertisers. There isn't much point in creating any sort of fun content on the web if it never actually gets seen by human eyes, but instead is just regurgitated into a slurry.

visarga 3y ago
Funny, I like to play a LLM game - copy paste a whole conversation thread into a LLM and ask "Write a 500 word article based on this material". The result is well grounded enjoyable "regurgitated slurry". It's a match made in heaven - people's opinions debating stuff and LLMs ability to phrase that like professional written articles. Grounding and style. I'm afraid in the future not even our social network posts will be directly read by other people. Everything will pass through an AI extractor-reformatter. As an experiment, copy paste a few pages of comments into a LLM and see the quality of its outputs. I often grok a new angle or make a new connection after reading the AI text. Here's a sample, what it understood from our thread: "The discussion touches on concerns around AI interfering with traditional content creation, advertising models, and how we discover and consume information online as AI language understanding and generation capabilities advance." Pretty spot on framing.
- 12_throw_away 3y ago
  > Here's a sample, what it understood from our thread: "The discussion touches on concerns around AI interfering with traditional content creation, advertising models, and how we discover and consume information online as AI language understanding and generation capabilities advance." Pretty spot on framing. Could you clarify what value, exactly, you're finding in that series of words?
- pavel_lishin 3y ago
  Uh-huh. And what would you have understood from that summary?

visarga 3y ago

Funny, I like to play a LLM game - copy paste a whole conversation thread into a LLM and ask "Write a 500 word article based on this material". The result is well grounded enjoyable "regurgitated slurry". It's a match made in heaven - people's opinions debating stuff and LLMs ability to phrase that like professional written articles. Grounding and style. I'm afraid in the future not even our social network posts will be directly read by other people. Everything will pass through an AI extractor-reformatter. As an experiment, copy paste a few pages of comments into a LLM and see the quality of its outputs. I often grok a new angle or make a new connection after reading the AI text. Here's a sample, what it understood from our thread: "The discussion touches on concerns around AI interfering with traditional content creation, advertising models, and how we discover and consume information online as AI language understanding and generation capabilities advance." Pretty spot on framing.

12_throw_away 3y ago
> Here's a sample, what it understood from our thread: "The discussion touches on concerns around AI interfering with traditional content creation, advertising models, and how we discover and consume information online as AI language understanding and generation capabilities advance." Pretty spot on framing. Could you clarify what value, exactly, you're finding in that series of words?
pavel_lishin 3y ago
Uh-huh. And what would you have understood from that summary?