> your solution here just makes ads less valuable, which isn’t a win for advertisers or sites It sounds like that's a natural outcome of the point of the law i

> your solution here just makes ads less valuable, which isn’t a win for advertisers or sites It sounds like that's a natural outcome of the point of the law in the first place: people felt that, for too long, tracking has extracted too much value from them without their consent. Whether a website "buys in" to complying with the law is of course a risk analysis they can conduct for themselves. Neither advertisers nor sites are entitled to a "win" here.