5 ms·

Can I do this? Am I within HN etiquette to paste my post in another story? original here: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3976688 http://news.ycombinator.co

by delinka 14y ago

Can I do this? Am I within HN etiquette to paste my post in another story? original here: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3976688 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3976688 ===== Please learn to code. Also, learn to change your oil and maybe your spark plugs; learn to cook; learn to replace buttons on your shirts; learn to fix your leaky sink and plunge your toilet; learn to plant flowers and tomatoes; milk a cow; shovel some dirt; experience driving a tractor, both the kind in a field and the kind that pull tons of cargo down the expressway ... Get out of your comfort zone, live for a minute in someone else's shoes and maybe, just maybe, you'll learn to respect the work that other people do and be willing to pay them for it - they deserve to be paid for their Work. Yes, sitting behind a desk all day bringing brainpower to bear on saving the company money is Work. Driving 11 hours a day is Work. Grilling that steak and walking it to your table is Work. It's all Work because it takes us away from our families, because it's so well regulated that it adds stress, because we'd rather be doing other things but the bills have to be paid (i.e. we have to pay other people for the Work they do keeping our lights on, our Internet connected and our water reasonably clean.) So, please, learn to program. Then, when you need software built, you'll know why you hired me for "so much" and how much trouble I'm saving you.

deleted 14y ago
[deleted]
Tyrannosaurs 14y ago
The problem is that the list of things you should learn, as you imply, is endless. There's a reasonable case for learning literally thousands of skills to allow you to improve your life, understand what is possible or why something is non-trivial and there simply isn't the time to learn all of these things. As people who have embraced technology we all see the benefits of it and it's foremost in our minds as to how useful it would be if others did the same but how many of us have really weighed up the benefits of someone spending 20 hours learning basic coding against 20 hours learning to cook, or plumb, or speak a foreign language, or understand physiology, or how to listen, or a safe driving course, or plastering, or gardening, or understanding statistics, or history, or spending that time with a friend. It feels to me to be a gross generalisation - it's really useful to me therefore it's really useful - but without knowing more about the person in question, their life, their issues, how they think, that's really all it is.
- delinka 14y ago
  My post isn't encouraging everyone to learn everything. I'm trying to encourage people to do something different from what they normally do. People, especially the U.S. citizens I live near, need some perspective.
  - Tyrannosaurs 14y ago
    I agree that everyone should try something different, and that they should try something they consider scary and alien and borderline impossible (but that obviously isn't because other ordinarily competent people clearly do it).
- bnegreve 14y ago
  Atwood's blog post is entitled "Please don't learn how to code" which is an equally gross generalization for the reasons you mentioned. I guess "You don't have to learn how to code" would have been a more accurate title.
  - Tyrannosaurs 14y ago
    Agreed. I'm with Jeff on the idea that programming isn't in the same class as reading and writing and basic maths but I certainly don't agree with the whole article. But I think the criticism of his article isn't to say he's wrong, everyone should learn to code, it's that he's wrong, some people probably would benefit from learning to code. My issue is really with the people who flip his position 180 degrees and say "No, everyone should learn to code". Both positions are wrong.
- DanI-S 14y ago
  I think everybody should learn the fundamentals of programming for the same reason that we learn the fundamentals of physics - not because we're going to be reproducing Newton's experiments at home, but because we live in a world powered by physics, and life is easier and less frightening if you know a little about it.
  - 14y ago
tezza 14y ago
I posted on Jeff's original HN posting... so I know what it's like to have one's arguments split over multiple tit-for-tat postings. I also agree with what you advise that learning is good for its own sake esp. if it is a concrete skill. -- But I think the "learn to code in a year" fad has less to do with normal concrete skills. A lot of the cheerleading present this mysterious "Coding" as some form of national imperitive. I've seen references to how many 'coders' other countries have as some sort of Arms Race. More coders == better somehow. Whilst I admit having zero coders is bad, I just don't think that happens in practice.
partoa 14y ago
The effect of this post to me is that it makes me realize how vast the body of knowledge and skills is, and that is quite humbling. I must admit that I have tried around half the things on your list, but, as you imply, there is a larger list. ... learn to fly a plane; learn to fight with a sword; learn to design cars; learn to write novels; learn to make shoes; learn to design clothes ... So in that respect, why should I decide that one of my skills is the most utile on the planet and thus, everyone ought to be familiar with it. We all wear shoes that only a minority of humanity know how one can be built from scratch, and virtually no one can build one from scratch without requiring input from professions he/she doesn't understand. IMHO, this whole "Learn to code" thing is a bit egotistic. [EDIT] Changed "profession skill" to "one of my skills"

by delinka 14y ago

deleted 14y ago

[deleted]

Tyrannosaurs 14y ago

The problem is that the list of things you should learn, as you imply, is endless. There's a reasonable case for learning literally thousands of skills to allow you to improve your life, understand what is possible or why something is non-trivial and there simply isn't the time to learn all of these things. As people who have embraced technology we all see the benefits of it and it's foremost in our minds as to how useful it would be if others did the same but how many of us have really weighed up the benefits of someone spending 20 hours learning basic coding against 20 hours learning to cook, or plumb, or speak a foreign language, or understand physiology, or how to listen, or a safe driving course, or plastering, or gardening, or understanding statistics, or history, or spending that time with a friend. It feels to me to be a gross generalisation - it's really useful to me therefore it's really useful - but without knowing more about the person in question, their life, their issues, how they think, that's really all it is.

delinka 14y ago
My post isn't encouraging everyone to learn everything. I'm trying to encourage people to do something different from what they normally do. People, especially the U.S. citizens I live near, need some perspective.
- Tyrannosaurs 14y ago
  I agree that everyone should try something different, and that they should try something they consider scary and alien and borderline impossible (but that obviously isn't because other ordinarily competent people clearly do it).
bnegreve 14y ago
Atwood's blog post is entitled "Please don't learn how to code" which is an equally gross generalization for the reasons you mentioned. I guess "You don't have to learn how to code" would have been a more accurate title.
- Tyrannosaurs 14y ago
  Agreed. I'm with Jeff on the idea that programming isn't in the same class as reading and writing and basic maths but I certainly don't agree with the whole article. But I think the criticism of his article isn't to say he's wrong, everyone should learn to code, it's that he's wrong, some people probably would benefit from learning to code. My issue is really with the people who flip his position 180 degrees and say "No, everyone should learn to code". Both positions are wrong.
DanI-S 14y ago
I think everybody should learn the fundamentals of programming for the same reason that we learn the fundamentals of physics - not because we're going to be reproducing Newton's experiments at home, but because we live in a world powered by physics, and life is easier and less frightening if you know a little about it.
- 14y ago

tezza 14y ago

I posted on Jeff's original HN posting... so I know what it's like to have one's arguments split over multiple tit-for-tat postings. I also agree with what you advise that learning is good for its own sake esp. if it is a concrete skill. -- But I think the "learn to code in a year" fad has less to do with normal concrete skills. A lot of the cheerleading present this mysterious "Coding" as some form of national imperitive. I've seen references to how many 'coders' other countries have as some sort of Arms Race. More coders == better somehow. Whilst I admit having zero coders is bad, I just don't think that happens in practice.

partoa 14y ago

The effect of this post to me is that it makes me realize how vast the body of knowledge and skills is, and that is quite humbling. I must admit that I have tried around half the things on your list, but, as you imply, there is a larger list. ... learn to fly a plane; learn to fight with a sword; learn to design cars; learn to write novels; learn to make shoes; learn to design clothes ... So in that respect, why should I decide that one of my skills is the most utile on the planet and thus, everyone ought to be familiar with it. We all wear shoes that only a minority of humanity know how one can be built from scratch, and virtually no one can build one from scratch without requiring input from professions he/she doesn't understand. IMHO, this whole "Learn to code" thing is a bit egotistic. [EDIT] Changed "profession skill" to "one of my skills"