4 ms·
1. This doesn't seem relevant to the flat, decisive statement that water always wins. 2. Unless the water is represented by international court, it still doesn
by Freedom2 3y ago
1. This doesn't seem relevant to the flat, decisive statement that water always wins.
2. Unless the water is represented by international court, it still doesn't count as a win for water.
- pixl97 3y agoYour logic is quite questionable. 1. If a bully shows up and tries to beat you up, so you hit him in the face. You won, right? But what if we comes back tomorrow and tries again. What if he never stops coming back every single day forever. You have not won. At best you are in a stalemate in which you have to keep up the fight pouring massive amounts of money and effort into your game otherwise catastrophic outcomes (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Sea_flood_of_1953 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Sea_flood_of_1953) 2. If in that fight you shift the burden of the fight on to your neighbor, you're just an asshole, not a winner. And you're still caught in the loop of point 1.