3 ms·
I think it's obviously problematic that these companies are deriving value from millions of people without compensating them, while creating a product that comp
by __loam 3y ago
I think it's obviously problematic that these companies are deriving value from millions of people without compensating them, while creating a product that competes with those masses.
- lupire 3y agoYou are describing the original meaning of "cultural appropriation", like when jazz and rock & roll were copied from Black American culture and sold.
- __loam 3y agoI am describing "copyright infringement"
- pelagicAustral 3y agoIf you are selling something, and no one is buying it, the value you have generated is zero. If you put something online and you did not bother to understand this material can potentially be used by a third-party on account of its loose licensing, then who's to blame?
- int_19h 3y agoBut the licensing isn't loose in many (most?) cases we're aware of. Merely making an image publicly available online doesn't give the viewers rights to do whatever they want with it under our copyright laws.
- pelagicAustral 3y agoWell, I suppose the keyword here is "most?" because the burden of proof lies with the prosecution, the legal gymnastics of coming up a reasonable argument to this will be interesting.