3 ms·
Or that we already train humans on copyrighted data and then employ that human intelligence for commercial use. You can argue that AI is a categorically differ
by anon84873628 3y ago
Or that we already train humans on copyrighted data and then employ that human intelligence for commercial use.
You can argue that AI is a categorically different scale that requires special regulation to protect our societal values (and I think I do) but that is a different claim and implementation than copyright enforcement.
- petre 3y agoIt should be viewed as derivarive work. It equally applies to humans. It shouldn't be classified as fair use because the works have been used in whole to train the model. 'A "derivative work" is a work based upon one or more preexisting works, such as a translation, musical arrangement, dramatization, fictionalization, motion picture version, sound recording, art reproduction, abridgment, condensation, or any other form in which a work may be recast, transformed, or adapted.' (US Copyright Act of 1976)
- hnfong 3y agoYou’re saying after a student learns physics from a copyrighted textbook they have to pay the textbook publisher royalties to work as a physicist?