3 ms·
32 pages of legal details to induce solid sleep: https://torrentfreak.com/images/cox-opinion.pdf https://torrentfreak.com/images/cox-opinion.pdf "We affirm the
by synctext 3y ago
32 pages of legal details to induce solid sleep:
https://torrentfreak.com/images/cox-opinion.pdf https://torrentfreak.com/images/cox-opinion.pdf
"We affirm the jury’s finding of willful contributory infringement. But we reverse the vicarious liability verdict and remand for a new trial on damages because Cox did not
profit from its subscribers’ acts of infringement, a legal prerequisite for vicarious liability."
- p0w3n3d 3y agowhen law people get to pronounce in IT cases, it's always 50/50. 50% money 50% superstitions/beliefs. However in US it's really dangerous because of precedent law