I see a often made error in here. There is a confusion of having a "knowledge graph/network/retrieval system " and a brain, having 99% of it's mass for movement

I see a often made error in here. There is a confusion of having a "knowledge graph/network/retrieval system " and a brain, having 99% of it's mass for movement control, sensor data processing, keeping alive etc.. So it's a definition problem what general intelligence is and what should it be capable to do. We're far far away from walking robots on the streets, but we're not very far away from reasoning systems that can be used to retrieve information, like it would happen the same whenever one asks an expert - the information flows off the expert's brain by utilizing 99 percent of the brain for doing the necessary movements so the information is translated to oscillated air waves.. I give it 1-2 years given the pace the whole topic is developed at and the Money pumped into. All the people saying "neii.. next century" or "it's a pigeon", "nothing different than an look up dictionary" - all this guys clearly confuse and not clear about things.