3 ms·
From reading the article, it sounds like what the judge actually ruled is not what the headline seems to claim that the judge ruled. It seems that the judge is
by ensignavenger 3y ago
From reading the article, it sounds like what the judge actually ruled is not what the headline seems to claim that the judge ruled. It seems that the judge is simply saying the case can proceed to the next phase. The plaintiffs, it appears, still need to argue their claim of product liability. So they still need to present a case to the court that each of the defendants products are in fact defective.
- m463 3y agoI wonder if this is "the disconnection of article and headline" sort of thing. I've read some article authors have no control over the headlines associated with their writings, either added by someone else, or generated or a/b tested or whatever.