5 ms·
Not possible within this century.
by cvalka 3y ago
Not possible within this century.
- atleastoptimal 3y agoWhy do you believe this?
- cvalka 3y agoBecause we are nowhere close to it. There's a difference between a moon landing and interstellar human travel.
- atleastoptimal 3y agoWhat specifically makes it so infeasible in your opinion, given the rate of AI progress over the past 5 years? Do you believe no amount of scaling will reach human intelligence?
- theGeatZhopa 3y agoI see a often made error in here. There is a confusion of having a "knowledge graph/network/retrieval system " and a brain, having 99% of it's mass for movement control, sensor data processing, keeping alive etc.. So it's a definition problem what general intelligence is and what should it be capable to do. We're far far away from walking robots on the streets, but we're not very far away from reasoning systems that can be used to retrieve information, like it would happen the same whenever one asks an expert - the information flows off the expert's brain by utilizing 99 percent of the brain for doing the necessary movements so the information is translated to oscillated air waves.. I give it 1-2 years given the pace the whole topic is developed at and the Money pumped into. All the people saying "neii.. next century" or "it's a pigeon", "nothing different than an look up dictionary" - all this guys clearly confuse and not clear about things.
- cvalka 3y agoYou write like a zhopa or zhopoi.
- theGeatZhopa 3y agoBoth, I guess. Next thing to try v zhope...
- cvalka 3y agoI do not believe scaling the existing models will reach human intelligence.