> No, it's like arguing that all people who are no longer in their prime need walk-on ramps or lifts in addition to stairs. That's basically exactly what I sai

> No, it's like arguing that all people who are no longer in their prime need walk-on ramps or lifts in addition to stairs. That's basically exactly what I said yeah. Which isn't correct because plenty of people who are not in their prime still do not need those things. It doesn't help with making your point. Instead I'd cite statistics on how many people actually use these accessibility features, and not some far more general group of "how many people are not perfect". Also, in case it isn't clear, I'm not arguing against accessibility features at all, I just think this part of your argument was a bit misleading.