5 ms·
Got it. Appreciate that. That makes sense. Was genuinely curious.
by ijidak 3y ago
Got it. Appreciate that. That makes sense.
Was genuinely curious.
- willcipriano 3y agoOn the cost front do you still need a cal[0] for every user/device? [0]https://www.trustedtechteam.com/collections/microsoft-sql-server-cals https://www.trustedtechteam.com/collections/microsoft-sql-se...
- kstrauser 3y agoFrom https://www.trustedtechteam.com/collections/microsoft-sql-server-cals https://www.trustedtechteam.com/collections/microsoft-sql-se... > CALs offer businesses the flexibility to scale their client access as needed, accommodating a varying number of users or devices accessing SQL Server. The gall required to write that sentence is astonishing.
- mixmastamyk 3y agoBuried one of the most important reasons—FLOSS. Postgres and their org respects you, unlike MSFT.