4 ms·
Because the alternative would be to make some annoying demands of the auto industry, of various police services, and of CP Rail and the ports. That's a lot of
by anonymousab 3y ago
Because the alternative would be to make some annoying demands of the auto industry, of various police services, and of CP Rail and the ports.
That's a lot of political capital to spend (or burn) on a lot of different groups, and would likely anger a lot of bases of power and financial support, for some citizen benefits that won't really pay off in the short term.
By contrast, banning a scary foreign hacker device with existing vague pop culture presence is a far more effective way of seeming like you're doing something with the average voter while not causing issues with any important groups and not having to spend much time or money.
The efficacy for stopping car thefts is not really the goal.