4 ms·
https://github.com/KevM/tikaondotnet https://github.com/KevM/tikaondotnet ?
by CharlieDigital 3y ago
https://github.com/KevM/tikaondotnet https://github.com/KevM/tikaondotnet ?
- mdaniel 3y ago> https://github.com/KevM/tikaondotnet/releases/tag/v1.17.1 https://github.com/KevM/tikaondotnet/releases/tag/v1.17.1 - Apr 3, 2018 You're right, how silly of me, I'll install some rando's 6 year old build of it right away. But in seriousness, that readme did remind me of the thing I was thinking of: http://www.ikvm.net/userguide/ikvmc.html http://www.ikvm.net/userguide/ikvmc.html
- CharlieDigital 3y agoMaybe your question is the wrong one to ask. My inclination is that a package or library that isn't actively maintained has no utility. If that's the case, then the assumptions underlying that package are perhaps not relevant. Personally, I'd say it is probably the case that there are better alternatives. Azure Document Intelligence being one of those. Sure, it can't handle the variety of formats, but again, we have to come back to the underlying assumptions: .docx, .pdf, and a few handful of formats probably covers 99% of business use cases. Everything else would be considered niche.