4 ms·
It should be in the LaTeX sources on the website. This does look much more compact though. Just to now push it a little. I wonder if I can make the `1/(d+1)`
by trueismywork 3y ago
It should be in the LaTeX sources on the website. This does look much more compact though.
Just to now push it a little.
I wonder if I can make the `1/(d+1)` in the superscript be not a real fraction but inline fraction.
- cbolton 3y agoYou can do that by escaping the slash: `1\/(d+1)`
- trueismywork 3y agoCool
- cbolton 3y agoHere are the LaTeX versions from the article source: \begin{align} \begin{split} \mathcal{C}(M) = &\: \Et^t(\theta,\S_t)^2 + C_t M_t^{-\frac{2}{d}} + \Et^\pde(\theta,\S_\inte)^2 +C_\pde M_\mathrm{int}^{-\frac{2}{d+1}}\\&+ C_1{T}^{\frac{1}{2}} \bigg[\Et^\divv(\theta,\S_\inte) +C_\divv M_\mathrm{int}^{-\frac{1}{d+1}}+(1+\nu) big( \Et^s(\theta,\S_s) + C_s M_s^{-\frac{1}{d}}\big)\bigg],\\ \end{split} \end{align} and for 3.12: \begin{align} \begin{split} \norm{(u_0)_j-\hu_j(t=0)}_{L^2(\mathbb{T}^d)} &\leq \norm{u_j-\hu_j}_{L^2(\partial \Omega)} \\&\leq \sqrt{\frac{2\max\left\{2h_\Omega,d+1\right\}} {\rho_\Omega}}\norm{u_j-\hu_j}_{H^1(\Omega)}\\ &\leq \sqrt{\frac{2\max\left\{2h_\Omega,d+1\right\}} {\rho_\Omega}}C_{1,k,d+1, u_1} \lambda_{1}(N)N^{-k+1}, \end{split} \end{align} Note that these rely on user-defined commands \Et, \pde, \inte, \divv, \S, \hu, for example \renewcommand{\S}{\mathcal{S}} and \newcommand{\Et}{\mathcal{E}_T}.
- trueismywork 3y agoYup. Much more verbose. However, I must admit, all the unescaped names in Typst leaves me with any eerie feeling. It seems a ground ripe for a name conflict at some point. Or a bottleneck for customization like calligraphic C or script C.