3 ms·

We cannot change the way <img> is parsed. See e.g. http://software.hixie.ch/utilities/js/live-dom-viewer/ http://software.hixie.ch/utilities/js/live-dom-viewer/

• user24 14y ago
  Fair enough, but that is a technical limitation which is trivial to get around: <setsrc> <img src="foo.jpg"> <set src="foo1.jpg" width="100"> <set src="foo2.jpg" density="2"> </setsrc> Always be wary of allowing arguments that hinge on "it's not technically possible" to shut down good ideas.
  • Kilimanjaro 14y ago
    FTFY <imgset> <img src="foo.jpg"> <img src="foo1.jpg" width="100"> <img src="foo2.jpg" density="2"> </imgset>
    • tubes 14y ago
      Not a good idea. Browsers that do not support imgset would show all three images using that syntax. A new element name like "<set>" would be ignored by them.
      • Kilimanjaro 14y ago
        CSS to the rescue imgset img{display:none;} imgset img:first-child{display:block;} Same with modern HTML5 tags, modernizer or any other tool would handle that for you.
        • user24 14y ago
          Not really, what about browsers that don't support first-child? Backwards compatibility is important.