Not 'science', our reporting of science. We no longer have trusted sources for 'facts'. Lots of science is reported on YT and it is fine. You can't take a stu

Not 'science', our reporting of science. We no longer have trusted sources for 'facts'. Lots of science is reported on YT and it is fine. You can't take a study in 'Nature' and say it is fine, but then if that study is reported in a video on YT, now it is in question. The video on the flood above was fine, there was nothing incorrect in it, why is it 'wrong' by being on YT? Maybe a % of garbage rating? But who does the judging?